Gideon Stitt, BCPPS, BCCCP, PharmD,
T32 Post-Doctoral Research Fellow in Clinical Pharmacology
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Disclosure information not submitted.
Julie Fitzgerald, MD, PhD, FCCM
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Disclosure information not submitted.
Marissa Leff
Student Clinical Research Assistant
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, United States
Disclosure information not submitted.
Kevin Downes
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Disclosure information not submitted.
Title: Renal Function Estimation Using Serum Creatinine and Cystatin C in Critically Ill Pediatric Patients
Introduction: Serum creatinine (SCr) has known confounders as a marker of renal function that may lead to drug over- or under-dosing. Cystatin C (CysC) is less influenced by body composition and gaining traction in practice as an alternative to SCr. We hypothesized that renal function estimates would be significantly lower using CysC compared to SCr.
Methods: We performed a retrospective study of PICU patients who had SCr and CysC measured simultaneously from 8/2020-6/2021. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using the bedside Schwartz (eGFRSCr = 0.413*ht(cm)/SCr) and CKiD cystatin C (eGFRCysC = 70.69*CysC-0.931) equations. Correlation and agreement between GFR estimates were assessed using Spearman correlation and Bland-Altman tests, respectively. Factors associated with eGFR differences >30% were examined using a Fisher’s exact test and impacts of differences on drug dosing with descriptive statistics.
Results: 57 patients (60% male) had simultaneous SCr and CysC measurements during our study period. Median (IQR) age was 9.1 yrs (4.3-16.6), weight 24.4 kg (16.5-40), and BMI 18.5 (16.5-21.7). Most common PICU admission diagnoses included respiratory failure (56%), sepsis (19%), and need for neurologic monitoring (19%). Median eGFRSCr and eGFRCysC were 128 (85-183) and 71 (53-118) mL/min/1.73m2 (p< 0.0001). Correlation between eGFRSCr and eGFRCysC was 0.575. Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean difference between eGFRSCr and eGFRCysC of -52 mL/min/1.73m2 (95%CI -69 to -35). 35 (61%) patients had eGFRSCr >30% higher than eGFRCysC; no patient factors (age, weight, BMI, diagnoses) were associated with this difference. Assessing potential dosing impacts, 16 (28%) patients had concurrent eGFRSCr >130 with eGFRCysC < 130, 19 (33%) had eGFRSCr >60 and eGFRCysC < 60, and 6 (10.5%) had eGFRSCr >130 with eGFRCysC < 60 mL/min/1.73m2.
Conclusions: eGFRCysC was significantly lower than eGFRSCr, and agreement between the two GFR estimates was poor. Use of SCr versus CysC may lead to substantial differences in GFR estimates in critically ill children, which can have a large impact on drug dosing.